+42.1%
ENTG vs ARMK
+91.9%
-49.8%
-56.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.6% | +4.5% | -1.9% | -0.7% |
| 7D | -17.1% | -2.6% | -14.5% | -15.2% |
| 30D | -23.0% | -5.2% | -17.8% | -19.4% |
| 3M | -10.2% | -6.5% | -3.7% | -5.4% |
| 6M | -17.8% | +15.3% | -33.0% | -26.1% |
| YTD | +52.4% | +43.6% | +8.8% | +16.2% |
| 1Y | +49.8% | +42.1% | +7.7% | +15.1% |
| 3Y | +42.1% | +94.0% | -51.9% | -5.6% |
| All | +42.1% | +91.9% | -49.8% | -5.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling