+82.9%
ENTG vs ARMK
+42.9%
+40.0%
-41.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.7% | +0.2% | -0.8% | -0.8% |
| 7D | +22.8% | +7.1% | +15.7% | +16.7% |
| 30D | -4.9% | -1.6% | -3.2% | -3.0% |
| 3M | -4.8% | -10.5% | +5.7% | +2.3% |
| 6M | +5.6% | +11.8% | -6.2% | -1.3% |
| YTD | +82.4% | +47.3% | +35.1% | +32.2% |
| 1Y | +82.9% | +41.5% | +41.4% | +37.1% |
| All | +82.9% | +42.9% | +40.0% | +37.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling