+65.7%
ENTG vs ARMK
+41.1%
+24.6%
-41.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -6.5% | -4.2% | -2.3% | -3.6% |
| 7D | -10.3% | -5.8% | -4.5% | -6.5% |
| 30D | -14.4% | -5.3% | -9.1% | -10.7% |
| 3M | -1.1% | -6.7% | +5.6% | +4.0% |
| 6M | +3.0% | +17.4% | -14.4% | -7.5% |
| YTD | +70.1% | +43.0% | +27.1% | +26.2% |
| 1Y | +65.7% | +40.3% | +25.4% | +24.5% |
| All | +65.7% | +41.1% | +24.6% | +24.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling