+71.3%
EEM vs ZTS
-48.5%
+119.8%
-18.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.5% | +0.5% | -1.9% | -1.5% |
| 7D | +5.3% | +1.0% | +4.3% | +5.2% |
| 30D | -7.0% | +12.4% | -19.4% | -8.3% |
| 3M | -8.0% | +13.6% | -21.6% | -9.5% |
| 6M | -6.6% | +9.3% | -15.9% | -7.9% |
| YTD | +12.3% | -32.6% | +44.9% | +20.5% |
| 1Y | +12.2% | -30.0% | +42.2% | +19.4% |
| All | +71.3% | -48.5% | +119.8% | +91.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling