+32.5%
EEM vs ZTS
-50.2%
+82.7%
-14.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.2% | -0.6% | -1.5% | -2.1% |
| 7D | -0.7% | -4.5% | +3.8% | -0.4% |
| 30D | +2.4% | -3.3% | +5.7% | +2.6% |
| 3M | +4.2% | -9.7% | +13.9% | +5.2% |
| 6M | +14.8% | -38.8% | +53.6% | +23.7% |
| YTD | +23.1% | -41.2% | +64.3% | +33.9% |
| 1Y | +32.5% | -50.3% | +82.8% | +47.8% |
| All | +32.5% | -50.2% | +82.7% | +47.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling