+40.5%
EEM vs ZTS
-49.3%
+89.9%
-14.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.8% | -0.6% | +2.5% | +1.9% |
| 7D | +2.3% | -2.0% | +4.3% | +2.5% |
| 30D | +4.5% | +1.9% | +2.6% | +4.3% |
| 3M | -0.1% | -4.0% | +3.9% | +0.4% |
| 6M | +16.9% | -39.1% | +56.1% | +26.6% |
| YTD | +26.2% | -38.8% | +65.0% | +36.8% |
| 1Y | +40.5% | -49.6% | +90.1% | +56.1% |
| All | +40.5% | -49.3% | +89.9% | +56.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling