+51.1%
EBAY vs HTZ
-85.9%
+137.0%
-53.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.3% | +1.3% | -3.6% | -2.4% |
| 7D | -2.1% | +7.5% | -9.6% | -2.6% |
| 30D | -6.7% | +47.4% | -54.1% | -10.2% |
| 3M | -5.0% | -54.9% | +49.9% | -0.9% |
| 6M | +14.6% | -47.0% | +61.6% | +17.1% |
| YTD | +19.8% | -55.3% | +75.1% | +23.8% |
| 1Y | +12.6% | -57.6% | +70.2% | +15.7% |
| 3Y | +141.0% | -86.6% | +227.6% | +179.7% |
| All | +51.1% | -85.9% | +137.0% | +66.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling