+217.6%
EBAY vs HTZ
-82.6%
+300.1%
-20.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.1% | -8.4% | +7.3% | -0.8% |
| 7D | +0.3% | -14.6% | +14.8% | +0.8% |
| 30D | +13.3% | -20.8% | +34.1% | +14.2% |
| 3M | +11.1% | -18.8% | +29.9% | +11.3% |
| 6M | +13.4% | -74.7% | +88.1% | +18.8% |
| YTD | +41.3% | -68.1% | +109.4% | +45.6% |
| 1Y | +52.8% | -73.5% | +126.3% | +58.6% |
| 3Y | +217.6% | -81.8% | +299.4% | +242.2% |
| All | +217.6% | -82.6% | +300.1% | +242.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling