+228.1%
EBAY vs HTZ
-82.4%
+310.5%
-20.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.6% | -2.6% | +3.2% | +0.7% |
| 7D | -0.9% | -8.5% | +7.7% | -0.6% |
| 30D | +3.5% | -18.9% | +22.4% | +4.1% |
| 3M | +16.0% | -36.0% | +52.0% | +17.6% |
| 6M | +7.6% | -74.6% | +82.2% | +12.5% |
| YTD | +40.1% | -70.8% | +110.9% | +44.7% |
| 1Y | +45.0% | -75.3% | +120.3% | +50.8% |
| 3Y | +228.1% | -81.6% | +309.7% | +250.6% |
| All | +228.1% | -82.4% | +310.5% | +250.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling