+55.2%
EBAY vs HTZ
-60.6%
+115.8%
-17.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.5% | +9.2% | -3.7% | +5.3% |
| 7D | +6.0% | +18.9% | -12.9% | +5.6% |
| 30D | +16.8% | +26.3% | -9.4% | +16.1% |
| 3M | +14.5% | +49.7% | -35.1% | +12.1% |
| 6M | +15.1% | -61.1% | +76.2% | +19.9% |
| YTD | +45.0% | -56.0% | +101.0% | +46.4% |
| 1Y | +55.2% | -66.4% | +121.6% | +66.1% |
| All | +55.2% | -60.6% | +115.8% | +66.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling