+605.0%
EAT vs BLDR
-56.4%
+661.4%
-45.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BLDR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.2% | -1.9% | -1.3% | -2.7% |
| 7D | -6.8% | -2.7% | -4.1% | -6.1% |
| 30D | -5.4% | -14.7% | +9.3% | -1.8% |
| 3M | +42.8% | -20.8% | +63.6% | +49.8% |
| 6M | +56.5% | -35.3% | +91.9% | +72.7% |
| YTD | +50.0% | -40.3% | +90.4% | +68.1% |
| 1Y | +38.3% | -56.3% | +94.6% | +68.8% |
| All | +605.0% | -56.4% | +661.4% | +709.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BLDR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BLDR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BLDR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BLDR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling