-14.2%
EAT vs BLDR
-14.4%
+0.1%
-28.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3mo.
| Period | Portfolio | BLDR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.1% | -4.6% | +0.5% | -3.6% |
| 7D | -5.9% | -1.1% | -4.8% | -5.5% |
| 30D | +0.7% | +19.1% | -18.4% | +1.3% |
| 3M | -14.2% | -12.6% | -1.7% | -17.8% |
| All | -14.2% | -14.4% | +0.1% | -17.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BLDR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BLDR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BLDR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BLDR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · Available span rolling