+215.1%
DINO vs KRMN
+17.4%
+197.7%
-31.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | KRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | -11.3% | +11.1% | +0.1% |
| 7D | +2.0% | -12.9% | +14.8% | +2.2% |
| 30D | +27.7% | -43.3% | +71.0% | +29.1% |
| 3M | +56.3% | -27.2% | +83.5% | +56.9% |
| 6M | +107.6% | -66.8% | +174.4% | +116.3% |
| YTD | +140.2% | -51.9% | +192.0% | +137.9% |
| 1Y | +113.0% | -43.7% | +156.6% | +105.1% |
| All | +215.1% | +17.4% | +197.7% | +152.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling