+214.3%
DINO vs KRMN
+17.6%
+196.7%
-31.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | KRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | +2.6% | -2.5% | +0.1% |
| 7D | +2.3% | -11.8% | +14.1% | +2.5% |
| 30D | +22.6% | -43.0% | +65.7% | +24.0% |
| 3M | +55.2% | -28.8% | +84.1% | +56.0% |
| 6M | +93.8% | -66.3% | +160.1% | +101.8% |
| YTD | +139.5% | -51.8% | +191.3% | +137.2% |
| 1Y | +115.3% | -44.7% | +160.0% | +108.0% |
| All | +214.3% | +17.6% | +196.7% | +151.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling