+276.3%
DINO vs FLNC
-71.1%
+347.4%
-57.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.4% | -4.2% | +3.9% | -0.1% |
| 7D | +1.5% | -5.0% | +6.5% | +1.7% |
| 30D | +25.9% | -26.1% | +52.0% | +28.0% |
| 3M | +53.2% | -55.2% | +108.4% | +59.4% |
| 6M | +105.5% | -42.6% | +148.1% | +107.1% |
| YTD | +139.2% | -51.0% | +190.3% | +141.0% |
| 1Y | +117.4% | +43.3% | +74.0% | +97.2% |
| 3Y | +99.3% | -63.4% | +162.7% | +85.9% |
| All | +276.3% | -71.1% | +347.4% | +247.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling