+98.8%
DINO vs FLNC
-62.9%
+161.6%
-57.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | +2.5% | -2.4% | 0.0% |
| 7D | +2.3% | -4.1% | +6.4% | +2.5% |
| 30D | +22.6% | -24.8% | +47.4% | +24.1% |
| 3M | +55.2% | -59.1% | +114.3% | +61.1% |
| 6M | +93.8% | -42.0% | +135.7% | +94.9% |
| YTD | +139.5% | -49.8% | +189.3% | +140.4% |
| 1Y | +115.3% | +43.1% | +72.2% | +95.7% |
| 3Y | +98.8% | -61.0% | +159.7% | +76.5% |
| All | +98.8% | -62.9% | +161.6% | +76.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling