+103.7%
DINO vs ACGL
+35.2%
+68.5%
-57.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ACGL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.7% | -1.7% | +1.0% | -0.4% |
| 7D | +5.7% | -0.7% | +6.5% | +5.9% |
| 30D | +27.8% | -1.0% | +28.8% | +28.0% |
| 3M | +45.6% | +11.0% | +34.6% | +42.4% |
| 6M | +88.5% | -0.3% | +88.8% | +88.0% |
| YTD | +134.1% | +2.3% | +131.8% | +131.9% |
| 1Y | +111.1% | +6.4% | +104.7% | +106.9% |
| All | +103.7% | +35.2% | +68.5% | +100.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACGL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACGL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACGL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACGL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling