+119.0%
DINO vs ACGL
+2.4%
+116.6%
-17.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ACGL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.8% | -2.4% | +5.2% | +2.7% |
| 7D | +4.2% | -2.9% | +7.1% | +4.1% |
| 30D | +33.9% | -2.8% | +36.7% | +33.7% |
| 3M | +50.5% | +6.8% | +43.7% | +50.3% |
| 6M | +95.2% | -1.5% | +96.7% | +95.4% |
| YTD | +140.6% | -0.2% | +140.8% | +139.2% |
| 1Y | +119.0% | +5.3% | +113.7% | +116.5% |
| All | +119.0% | +2.4% | +116.6% | +116.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACGL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACGL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACGL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACGL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling