+26.1%
DECK vs NIO
-90.7%
+116.8%
-64.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.6% | -1.6% | +3.1% | +1.8% |
| 7D | -2.2% | -13.0% | +10.8% | -0.2% |
| 30D | -13.6% | -18.3% | +4.7% | -11.1% |
| 3M | -21.2% | -33.2% | +12.0% | -16.7% |
| 6M | -21.1% | -21.5% | +0.4% | -19.2% |
| YTD | -17.2% | -25.5% | +8.3% | -14.8% |
| 1Y | -30.7% | -38.0% | +7.3% | -27.3% |
| 3Y | -3.4% | -65.5% | +62.1% | +5.7% |
| All | +26.1% | -90.7% | +116.8% | +61.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling