+7.2%
DECK vs NIO
-56.1%
+63.4%
-35.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.5% | -3.0% | +1.5% | -1.2% |
| 7D | +6.0% | -3.6% | +9.6% | +6.4% |
| 30D | +7.4% | -8.0% | +15.5% | +8.2% |
| 3M | -11.7% | -31.2% | +19.5% | -9.1% |
| 6M | -11.0% | -45.8% | +34.8% | -7.1% |
| YTD | -15.4% | -37.3% | +21.9% | -13.2% |
| 1Y | +7.2% | -56.1% | +63.4% | +9.4% |
| All | +7.2% | -56.1% | +63.4% | +9.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling