+1,276.1%
CRDO vs NTAP
+137.9%
+1,138.2%
-62.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NTAP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.5% | -0.6% | -3.9% | -4.0% |
| 7D | -2.4% | -1.0% | -1.4% | -1.6% |
| 30D | -35.3% | -7.5% | -27.8% | -30.8% |
| 3M | -32.6% | +14.6% | -47.2% | -40.7% |
| 6M | +42.7% | +91.0% | -48.3% | -25.9% |
| YTD | +11.4% | +73.7% | -62.3% | -38.0% |
| 1Y | -2.2% | +51.2% | -53.5% | -36.9% |
| 3Y | +912.1% | +146.1% | +765.9% | +323.9% |
| All | +1,276.1% | +137.9% | +1,138.2% | +431.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NTAP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NTAP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NTAP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NTAP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling