+942.5%
CRDO vs NTAP
+165.5%
+777.0%
-61.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NTAP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.6% | +8.5% | -6.9% | -5.2% |
| 7D | -4.5% | +7.4% | -11.8% | -10.2% |
| 30D | -39.2% | -1.4% | -37.9% | -38.8% |
| 3M | -38.5% | +24.6% | -63.0% | -49.2% |
| 6M | +40.6% | +105.9% | -65.3% | -29.9% |
| YTD | +13.2% | +88.5% | -75.3% | -39.8% |
| 1Y | +2.3% | +62.1% | -59.8% | -36.1% |
| 3Y | +942.5% | +169.1% | +773.5% | +381.5% |
| All | +942.5% | +165.5% | +777.0% | +381.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NTAP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NTAP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NTAP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NTAP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling