+1,339.9%
CRDO vs NIO
-83.4%
+1,423.3%
-62.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.7% | -0.3% | -1.4% | -1.6% |
| 7D | -18.8% | -6.7% | -12.2% | -17.3% |
| 30D | -32.9% | -20.0% | -12.8% | -29.1% |
| 3M | -24.5% | -30.5% | +5.9% | -17.8% |
| 6M | +52.7% | -20.7% | +73.4% | +58.9% |
| YTD | +16.6% | -25.7% | +42.3% | +22.9% |
| 1Y | +13.7% | -38.6% | +52.3% | +24.9% |
| 3Y | +959.0% | -62.3% | +1,021.3% | +1,087.6% |
| All | +1,339.9% | -83.4% | +1,423.3% | +1,765.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling