+925.7%
CRDO vs NIO
-65.5%
+991.2%
-61.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.5% | -3.2% | -1.3% | -3.9% |
| 7D | -2.4% | -7.3% | +4.9% | -0.9% |
| 30D | -35.3% | -22.5% | -12.8% | -31.9% |
| 3M | -32.6% | -30.9% | -1.7% | -27.6% |
| 6M | +42.7% | -37.2% | +79.9% | +54.3% |
| YTD | +11.4% | -29.8% | +41.2% | +17.5% |
| 1Y | -2.2% | -37.4% | +35.2% | +6.1% |
| All | +925.7% | -65.5% | +991.2% | +991.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling