+1,364.1%
CRDO vs HTZ
-87.5%
+1,451.6%
-62.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.9% | +1.3% | +2.6% | +3.8% |
| 7D | -26.7% | +7.5% | -34.2% | -27.3% |
| 30D | -24.1% | +47.4% | -71.5% | -27.5% |
| 3M | -21.6% | -54.9% | +33.3% | -17.2% |
| 6M | +66.3% | -47.0% | +113.3% | +72.2% |
| YTD | +18.5% | -55.3% | +73.8% | +24.1% |
| 1Y | +27.3% | -57.6% | +84.9% | +32.2% |
| 3Y | +914.7% | -86.6% | +1,001.3% | +1,242.1% |
| All | +1,364.1% | -87.5% | +1,451.6% | +1,812.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling