+755.1%
CRDO vs HTZ
-81.9%
+837.0%
-62.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.1% | -6.1% | +5.0% | -0.6% |
| 7D | +24.5% | -14.0% | +38.4% | +25.8% |
| 30D | -29.5% | -19.8% | -9.7% | -28.2% |
| 3M | -47.9% | -45.0% | -2.9% | -45.7% |
| 6M | -29.6% | -73.2% | +43.6% | -25.2% |
| YTD | -2.8% | -70.0% | +67.2% | +2.6% |
| 1Y | -12.8% | -75.7% | +62.9% | -7.2% |
| All | +755.1% | -81.9% | +837.0% | +818.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling