+934.4%
CRDO vs DECK
+72.7%
+861.7%
-62.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | DECK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.3% | -1.2% | +8.5% | +7.7% |
| 7D | -20.2% | +5.8% | -25.9% | -22.3% |
| 30D | -45.2% | +7.9% | -53.1% | -47.1% |
| 3M | -47.7% | -11.4% | -36.3% | -45.6% |
| 6M | -39.2% | -16.6% | -22.7% | -36.1% |
| YTD | -16.2% | -16.4% | +0.1% | -14.1% |
| 1Y | -25.9% | +8.6% | -34.6% | -33.9% |
| 3Y | +713.7% | -15.1% | +728.8% | +654.3% |
| All | +934.4% | +72.7% | +861.7% | +513.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DECK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DECK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DECK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DECK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling