+864.2%
CRDO vs DECK
+74.7%
+789.5%
-62.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | DECK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -17.7% | -1.5% | -16.2% | -17.1% |
| 7D | -32.0% | +6.0% | -38.1% | -33.8% |
| 30D | -49.1% | +7.4% | -56.6% | -50.8% |
| 3M | -50.0% | -11.7% | -38.3% | -47.9% |
| 6M | -42.0% | -11.0% | -31.0% | -40.7% |
| YTD | -21.9% | -15.4% | -6.6% | -20.3% |
| 1Y | -35.1% | +7.2% | -42.4% | -41.6% |
| 3Y | +656.4% | -11.8% | +668.3% | +588.7% |
| All | +864.2% | +74.7% | +789.5% | +469.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DECK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DECK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DECK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DECK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling