+900.4%
CRDO vs DECK
-3.0%
+903.4%
-61.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DECK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.9% | +1.6% | +2.3% | +3.4% |
| 7D | -26.7% | -2.2% | -24.5% | -26.1% |
| 30D | -24.1% | -13.6% | -10.5% | -20.6% |
| 3M | -21.6% | -21.2% | -0.3% | -16.3% |
| 6M | +66.3% | -21.1% | +87.4% | +76.5% |
| YTD | +18.5% | -17.2% | +35.8% | +22.1% |
| 1Y | +27.3% | -30.7% | +58.0% | +40.4% |
| All | +900.4% | -3.0% | +903.4% | +906.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DECK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DECK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DECK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DECK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling