+22.6%
CRCL vs HTZ
-62.3%
+84.9%
-80.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.1% | +1.3% | -2.5% | -1.3% |
| 7D | +17.1% | +7.5% | +9.6% | +16.0% |
| 30D | +61.3% | +47.4% | +13.8% | +50.7% |
| 3M | +12.7% | -54.9% | +67.6% | +22.4% |
| 6M | -3.1% | -47.0% | +43.9% | +1.3% |
| YTD | +28.7% | -55.3% | +83.9% | +38.4% |
| 1Y | -13.1% | -57.6% | +44.5% | -5.3% |
| All | +22.6% | -62.3% | +84.9% | +48.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling