-18.4%
CRCL vs HTZ
-73.1%
+54.7%
-80.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.3% | -8.4% | +6.1% | -1.0% |
| 7D | -6.4% | -14.6% | +8.2% | -4.2% |
| 30D | -16.0% | -20.8% | +4.7% | -13.2% |
| 3M | +7.3% | -18.8% | +26.1% | +9.2% |
| 6M | -44.3% | -74.7% | +30.4% | -34.5% |
| YTD | -14.4% | -68.1% | +53.7% | -3.6% |
| 1Y | -32.1% | -73.5% | +41.4% | -21.8% |
| All | -18.4% | -73.1% | +54.7% | +3.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling