+15.6%
CRCL vs HTZ
-64.2%
+79.7%
-80.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.8% | -5.0% | -0.8% | -5.1% |
| 7D | +7.5% | -2.5% | +9.9% | +7.8% |
| 30D | +44.3% | -3.7% | +48.0% | +43.6% |
| 3M | +16.5% | -57.0% | +73.5% | +27.4% |
| 6M | -5.6% | -47.0% | +41.3% | -1.6% |
| YTD | +21.3% | -57.5% | +78.8% | +31.4% |
| 1Y | -14.5% | -63.5% | +49.0% | -3.9% |
| All | +15.6% | -64.2% | +79.7% | +41.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling