-2.3%
CNC vs ARMK
+96.1%
-98.4%
-68.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.4% | -0.8% | +1.2% | +0.5% |
| 7D | -7.3% | +2.8% | -10.1% | -7.7% |
| 30D | +5.2% | -1.8% | +6.9% | +5.3% |
| 3M | +8.6% | -10.9% | +19.5% | +10.8% |
| 6M | +25.1% | +21.2% | +3.8% | +19.2% |
| YTD | +71.3% | +47.0% | +24.3% | +56.7% |
| 1Y | +99.3% | +42.9% | +56.5% | +83.1% |
| All | -2.3% | +96.1% | -98.4% | -14.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling