-1.3%
CNC vs ARMK
+125.3%
-126.5%
-68.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.7% | +1.4% | -5.1% | -3.9% |
| 7D | -1.0% | +1.7% | -2.7% | -1.3% |
| 30D | -1.8% | +3.1% | -4.9% | -2.5% |
| 3M | -0.7% | +9.2% | -9.9% | -2.5% |
| 6M | +47.9% | +43.7% | +4.3% | +37.1% |
| YTD | +56.9% | +57.4% | -0.4% | +43.1% |
| 1Y | +123.9% | +51.9% | +72.1% | +105.2% |
| 3Y | -1.3% | +125.4% | -126.7% | -13.0% |
| All | -1.3% | +125.3% | -126.5% | -13.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling