+104.9%
CNC vs ARMK
+50.3%
+54.5%
-32.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.8% | -1.2% | +0.4% | -0.5% |
| 7D | -4.9% | +0.3% | -5.2% | -5.0% |
| 30D | -3.8% | +2.4% | -6.1% | -4.4% |
| 3M | -3.2% | +6.1% | -9.3% | -5.1% |
| 6M | +47.9% | +41.8% | +6.1% | +29.0% |
| YTD | +55.7% | +55.5% | +0.1% | +29.2% |
| All | +104.9% | +50.3% | +54.5% | +69.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling