+74.5%
CLSK vs HTZ
-82.4%
+156.9%
-75.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.8% | -2.6% | -0.2% | -2.3% |
| 7D | +8.0% | -8.5% | +16.5% | +9.9% |
| 30D | -27.9% | -18.9% | -9.0% | -25.2% |
| 3M | -42.3% | -36.0% | -6.2% | -37.7% |
| 6M | -50.0% | -74.6% | +24.6% | -37.2% |
| YTD | -34.3% | -70.8% | +36.5% | -21.0% |
| 1Y | -44.5% | -75.3% | +30.8% | -30.9% |
| 3Y | +74.5% | -81.6% | +156.1% | +169.1% |
| All | +74.5% | -82.4% | +156.9% | +169.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling