-59.0%
CLSK vs HTZ
-75.8%
+16.8%
-69.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +8.5% | -8.4% | +16.8% | +10.0% |
| 7D | -19.7% | -14.6% | -5.1% | -17.2% |
| 30D | -46.5% | -20.8% | -25.8% | -44.2% |
| 3M | -51.7% | -18.8% | -32.9% | -50.5% |
| 6M | -57.5% | -74.7% | +17.2% | -41.4% |
| YTD | -39.1% | -68.1% | +29.0% | -26.3% |
| All | -59.0% | -75.8% | +16.8% | -41.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling