+47.0%
CLSK vs HTZ
-59.8%
+106.8%
-64.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.2% | -5.0% | +11.2% | +6.9% |
| 7D | +21.9% | -2.5% | +24.3% | +22.2% |
| 30D | +9.6% | -3.7% | +13.3% | +9.7% |
| 3M | -18.4% | -57.0% | +38.6% | -7.5% |
| 6M | +46.4% | -47.0% | +93.3% | +60.8% |
| YTD | +33.2% | -57.5% | +90.7% | +50.2% |
| 1Y | +47.0% | -63.5% | +110.5% | +78.7% |
| All | +47.0% | -59.8% | +106.8% | +78.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling