+39.8%
CLSK vs HTZ
-58.1%
+97.9%
-64.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.9% | +1.3% | -0.4% | +0.7% |
| 7D | +8.8% | +7.5% | +1.4% | +7.7% |
| 30D | -6.0% | +47.4% | -53.4% | -12.6% |
| 3M | -24.4% | -54.9% | +30.5% | -15.0% |
| 6M | +19.0% | -47.0% | +66.0% | +30.7% |
| YTD | +25.4% | -55.3% | +80.6% | +40.2% |
| 1Y | +39.8% | -57.6% | +97.4% | +52.9% |
| All | +39.8% | -58.1% | +97.9% | +52.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling