-57.6%
CLSK vs DECK
-10.2%
-47.4%
-69.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | DECK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -16.5% | -1.5% | -14.9% | -16.8% |
| 7D | -30.7% | +6.0% | -36.7% | -29.7% |
| 30D | -53.8% | +7.4% | -61.2% | -52.9% |
| 3M | -57.9% | -11.7% | -46.3% | -57.4% |
| 6M | -57.6% | -11.0% | -46.7% | -59.3% |
| All | -57.6% | -10.2% | -47.4% | -59.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DECK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DECK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DECK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DECK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling