+180.1%
CLSK vs DECK
-3.0%
+183.1%
-71.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DECK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.9% | +1.6% | -0.7% | +0.3% |
| 7D | +8.8% | -2.2% | +11.1% | +9.8% |
| 30D | -6.0% | -13.6% | +7.6% | -1.0% |
| 3M | -24.4% | -21.2% | -3.1% | -18.0% |
| 6M | +19.0% | -21.1% | +40.1% | +29.0% |
| YTD | +25.4% | -17.2% | +42.6% | +31.6% |
| 1Y | +39.8% | -30.7% | +70.5% | +57.0% |
| All | +180.1% | -3.0% | +183.1% | +229.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DECK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DECK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DECK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DECK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling