-36.2%
CLS vs ZETA
+124.4%
-160.6%
-56.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +8.5% | +7.6% | +0.9% | +5.4% |
| 7D | +2.8% | +18.8% | -16.0% | -3.7% |
| 30D | -30.1% | +12.6% | -42.7% | -33.2% |
| 3M | -21.7% | +29.5% | -51.2% | -28.7% |
| 6M | -36.2% | +128.6% | -164.8% | -53.6% |
| All | -36.2% | +124.4% | -160.6% | -53.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling