+1,242.3%
CLS vs ZETA
+280.9%
+961.4%
-54.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.8% | -4.1% | +4.9% | +1.8% |
| 7D | +4.6% | +2.7% | +1.9% | +4.0% |
| 30D | -13.9% | +15.8% | -29.7% | -17.0% |
| 3M | -26.6% | +35.4% | -62.0% | -32.2% |
| 6M | +15.4% | +67.1% | -51.7% | +0.8% |
| YTD | +5.7% | +54.1% | -48.4% | -7.1% |
| 1Y | +41.1% | +67.8% | -26.7% | +20.5% |
| All | +1,242.3% | +280.9% | +961.4% | +672.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling