+1,237.1%
CLS vs ENTG
+45.0%
+1,192.2%
-54.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ENTG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.8% | +6.2% | -5.3% | -2.8% |
| 7D | +4.6% | +2.8% | +1.7% | +2.6% |
| 30D | -13.9% | -4.7% | -9.2% | -11.5% |
| 3M | -26.6% | -0.7% | -25.8% | -28.6% |
| 6M | +15.4% | +7.7% | +7.7% | +6.7% |
| YTD | +5.7% | +65.1% | -59.4% | -26.3% |
| 1Y | +41.1% | +74.8% | -33.7% | -7.3% |
| All | +1,237.1% | +45.0% | +1,192.2% | +924.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENTG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENTG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENTG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENTG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling