+838.1%
CLS vs ENTG
+57.0%
+781.1%
-56.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ENTG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.4% | -3.8% | -1.6% | -3.1% |
| 7D | +16.3% | +15.2% | +1.1% | +6.6% |
| 30D | -25.7% | -3.6% | -22.0% | -23.7% |
| 3M | -30.9% | -10.0% | -20.9% | -26.0% |
| 6M | -35.5% | +1.8% | -37.3% | -37.7% |
| YTD | -18.7% | +75.5% | -94.2% | -45.0% |
| 1Y | -17.9% | +82.4% | -100.3% | -45.9% |
| 3Y | +838.1% | +58.5% | +779.6% | +559.8% |
| All | +838.1% | +57.0% | +781.1% | +559.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENTG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENTG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENTG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENTG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling