+36.7%
CLS vs ENTG
+75.0%
-38.3%
-41.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ENTG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.1% | +1.4% | -0.3% | +0.4% |
| 7D | +20.1% | +8.9% | +11.2% | +14.9% |
| 30D | +6.0% | -0.8% | +6.9% | +6.7% |
| 3M | -10.3% | +6.6% | -16.8% | -15.1% |
| 6M | +24.5% | +22.1% | +2.4% | +11.7% |
| YTD | +12.9% | +70.2% | -57.3% | -12.0% |
| 1Y | +36.7% | +76.7% | -40.0% | +9.6% |
| All | +36.7% | +75.0% | -38.3% | +9.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENTG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENTG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENTG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENTG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling