-17.9%
CLS vs ENTG
+78.6%
-96.5%
-56.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ENTG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.4% | -3.8% | -1.6% | -3.1% |
| 7D | +16.3% | +15.2% | +1.1% | +6.8% |
| 30D | -25.7% | -3.6% | -22.0% | -23.8% |
| 3M | -30.9% | -10.0% | -20.9% | -26.3% |
| 6M | -35.5% | +1.8% | -37.3% | -37.2% |
| YTD | -18.7% | +75.5% | -94.2% | -38.5% |
| 1Y | -17.9% | +82.4% | -100.3% | -39.0% |
| All | -17.9% | +78.6% | -96.5% | -39.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENTG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENTG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENTG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENTG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling