-17.5%
CLF vs NIO
-64.6%
+47.0%
-74.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.8% | -1.6% | +3.3% | +2.1% |
| 7D | +7.6% | -13.0% | +20.6% | +10.0% |
| 30D | -1.2% | -18.3% | +17.1% | +2.1% |
| 3M | -13.4% | -33.2% | +19.8% | -7.5% |
| 6M | +15.4% | -21.5% | +36.9% | +18.6% |
| YTD | -5.9% | -25.5% | +19.6% | -2.5% |
| 1Y | +18.8% | -38.0% | +56.8% | +26.8% |
| All | -17.5% | -64.6% | +47.0% | -11.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling