+20.4%
CLF vs NIO
-55.0%
+75.3%
-48.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.2% | -4.9% | +1.7% | -2.6% |
| 7D | +10.4% | -14.5% | +24.8% | +12.4% |
| 30D | +0.6% | -15.0% | +15.5% | +2.4% |
| 3M | +4.1% | -35.6% | +39.7% | +9.2% |
| 6M | +15.1% | -55.7% | +70.8% | +26.5% |
| YTD | -4.7% | -43.1% | +38.4% | +2.7% |
| 1Y | +20.4% | -53.5% | +73.9% | +37.2% |
| All | +20.4% | -55.0% | +75.3% | +37.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling