+27.3%
CLBK vs EPAM
+46.1%
-18.8%
-10.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.0% | -3.9% | +4.9% | +1.1% |
| 7D | +0.6% | +13.4% | -12.7% | +0.3% |
| 30D | +2.9% | +47.1% | -44.2% | +1.3% |
| 3M | +3.0% | +71.2% | -68.2% | +0.6% |
| 6M | +27.3% | +48.9% | -21.6% | +23.5% |
| All | +27.3% | +46.1% | -18.8% | +23.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling