+70.3%
CLBK vs EPAM
-32.1%
+102.4%
-13.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | -1.5% | +0.9% | -0.4% |
| 7D | +1.1% | -0.9% | +2.0% | +1.2% |
| 30D | +7.8% | +18.4% | -10.6% | +5.8% |
| 3M | +23.9% | +19.2% | +4.6% | +20.7% |
| 6M | +42.3% | -21.0% | +63.3% | +47.3% |
| YTD | +65.4% | -43.7% | +109.1% | +82.2% |
| 1Y | +70.3% | -29.9% | +100.2% | +65.5% |
| All | +70.3% | -32.1% | +102.4% | +65.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling