+62.0%
CFG vs NIO
-92.1%
+154.1%
-56.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | +5.9% | -6.9% | -1.6% |
| 7D | -0.9% | +5.6% | -6.5% | -1.5% |
| 30D | +1.1% | -4.2% | +5.3% | +1.5% |
| 3M | -12.0% | -26.3% | +14.3% | -9.1% |
| 6M | -2.2% | -42.5% | +40.3% | +3.6% |
| YTD | +11.4% | -33.5% | +44.9% | +15.1% |
| 1Y | +27.8% | -52.7% | +80.5% | +37.5% |
| 3Y | +173.3% | -57.5% | +230.8% | +183.4% |
| All | +62.0% | -92.1% | +154.1% | +102.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling