+181.4%
CFG vs NIO
-64.6%
+245.9%
-29.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.1% | -1.6% | +1.5% | +0.1% |
| 7D | +1.5% | -13.0% | +14.6% | +2.7% |
| 30D | -3.8% | -18.3% | +14.4% | -2.3% |
| 3M | +11.5% | -33.2% | +44.7% | +15.0% |
| 6M | +19.2% | -21.5% | +40.7% | +20.4% |
| YTD | +23.7% | -25.5% | +49.2% | +25.4% |
| 1Y | +38.8% | -38.0% | +76.9% | +42.4% |
| All | +181.4% | -64.6% | +245.9% | +210.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling