+18.7%
CCL vs UMAC
-25.4%
+44.1%
-29.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.4% | -4.6% | +4.3% | -0.1% |
| 7D | -1.2% | -5.2% | +4.0% | -0.9% |
| 30D | +13.1% | -36.4% | +49.5% | +15.6% |
| 3M | +3.4% | -58.6% | +62.0% | +7.8% |
| 6M | +18.7% | -24.6% | +43.4% | +18.3% |
| All | +18.7% | -25.4% | +44.1% | +18.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling