+51.0%
CCL vs UMAC
+508.0%
-457.0%
-42.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.2% | -6.4% | +4.2% | -1.9% |
| 7D | -4.4% | +3.3% | -7.7% | -4.5% |
| 30D | -18.2% | -10.4% | -7.8% | -18.0% |
| 3M | -17.7% | +1.8% | -19.5% | -18.3% |
| 6M | -13.0% | +40.7% | -53.7% | -15.8% |
| YTD | -24.5% | +90.9% | -115.4% | -28.3% |
| 1Y | -26.9% | +151.8% | -178.7% | -31.9% |
| All | +51.0% | +508.0% | -457.0% | +27.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling