-2.9%
BTDR vs HTZ
-86.4%
+83.5%
-78.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.9% | +1.3% | +2.6% | +3.6% |
| 7D | +20.0% | +7.5% | +12.5% | +17.9% |
| 30D | +11.9% | +47.4% | -35.5% | -0.5% |
| 3M | -36.9% | -54.9% | +18.0% | -27.5% |
| 6M | +56.5% | -47.0% | +103.5% | +71.9% |
| YTD | +10.4% | -55.3% | +65.7% | +26.5% |
| 1Y | +3.1% | -57.6% | +60.7% | +16.3% |
| All | -2.9% | -86.4% | +83.5% | +137.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling