-71.7%
BTDR vs HTZ
-75.3%
+3.6%
-75.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +13.3% | -8.4% | +21.7% | +16.0% |
| 7D | -10.4% | -14.6% | +4.2% | -5.5% |
| 30D | -42.2% | -20.8% | -21.4% | -37.8% |
| 3M | -42.8% | -18.8% | -24.0% | -40.1% |
| 6M | -60.2% | -74.7% | +14.5% | -38.1% |
| YTD | -46.3% | -68.1% | +21.8% | -31.4% |
| 1Y | -71.7% | -73.5% | +1.8% | -59.6% |
| All | -71.7% | -75.3% | +3.6% | -59.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling